In a surprising turn of events, Dhanashree Verma’s family has firmly countered rampant rumors surrounding the financial aspects of her ongoing divorce from renowned cricketer Yuzvendra Chahal. Whispers suggesting that Dhanashree had demanded a whopping ₹60 crore alimony have been labeled as baseless by her family, who are urging for more responsible handling of such sensitive matters.

The celebrity pair, who tied the knot back in December 2020, recently filed for divorce via mutual consent in Mumbai’s Bandra Family Court. As the legal proceedings slowly unfold, the family's spokesperson has come forward to firmly reject the speculative reports, stating unequivocally that no such demand or discussion ever took place. Dubbing the reports as 'deeply irresponsible', the family urges media outlets to prioritize accuracy over sensation.

The ongoing speculation around Dhanashree and Yuzvendra’s relationship has been fueled further by their maneuvers on social media. Their online actions, such as unfollowing each other and removing shared photos, were seen as public signals of their private turmoil long before legal steps were taken. Cryptic posts from both parties had only served to stoke public curiosity.

Media and Privacy Concerns

With the case still under judicial review, both parties emphasize the importance of privacy during such difficult times. Yuzvendra Chahal’s legal advisor, Nitin K Gupta, reinforced the couple’s desire for minimal public interference, particularly given the case's sub judice status. Similarly, Dhanashree’s lawyer, Aditi Mohoni, has echoed these sentiments, underlining the damaging effects of premature and inaccurate reporting on their clients.

The divorce process has been attributed to 'compatibility issues', a vague but often cited reason in such proceedings. Allegedly, the couple had been living separately for nearly 18 months leading up to the legal filing. This detail adds a layer of complexity to the narrative, challenging public assumptions about their fairytale marriage.

Meanwhile, legal experts in the field have advised against the continued public debate of the case. They warn of the potential pitfalls of misinformation, encouraging observers to remain cautious and informed. The plea from Dhanashree's family for privacy underscores the broader challenges faced by public figures navigating personal matters under the magnifying glass of media scrutiny.